By Professor Simon Lovestone
Professor of Old Age Psychiatry, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for
Mental Health, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, De
Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF
Suppose you have memory problems and go to your doctor - what happens
next? At best, and the best is not always achieved, then an assessment
of memory and other cognitive function is made and, in some cases, a
referral is made to a memory clinic where there may be more memory tests
and perhaps a brain scan. If the outcomes of these tests are not severe
enough to warrant a clear-cut diagnosis then, usually, the cognitive
tests are repeated after a year to see if they have got worse. This is
unsatisfactory as the wait must seem interminable to patients and their
relatives. For professionals too, not being able to make an early
diagnosis is frustrating.
When treatments for Alzheimer's disease
(AD) go beyond symptomatic treatment to therapies for the illness
itself, this wait will be unacceptable since it is in this early phase,
before dementia is established, that the drugs are most likely to be
effective. This, then, is one of the most important drivers for research
into 'biomarkers' of AD. A biomarker is a biological signal that can be
detected for diagnosis, ideally very early and before doctors are
currently able to diagnose the condition. Biomarkers are also useful as
the basis of tests for measuring how a disease is progressing. This
latter use of biomarkers would be especially useful in research to find
new treatments for dementia. Currently clinical trials
rely almost entirely on memory tests which are sometimes less reliable
than we would like as measures of disease. A biomarker that reflected
the disease progression in the brain would be immensely useful as a
measure against which to judge new treatments.